Legal Opinion

Day v. Walden

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1881PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Kent. Case. Defendants brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Walden sued the plaintiffs in error, in an action on the case for tearing down a dam, and thereby precluding his enjoyment of a water-power, the right to the use of which he claimed as an easement. The declaration *577averred that at the time of the committing of the alleged grievances, the plaintiff was owner in fee-simple and lawfully possessed of a certain water-power and mill-site with the appurtenances, situate in the township of Wyoming, in the county of Kent and State of Michigan, and upon lands in like manner owned and possessed by the plaintiff, “ and more particularly described as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Corning v. GouldNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Maxwell v. Bay City Bridge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Hayes v. LivingstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Owen v. FieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. Showers v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hasselbring v. KoepkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Murphy Chair Co. v. American Radiator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Negaunee Iron Co. v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Woodside v. CiceroniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  5. McMorran Milling Co. v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API