Legal Opinion

Woodside v. Ciceroni

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 13, 1899No. 450PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern district of California.

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

On September 27, 1884, Joseph Hocking executed to John W. Anderson a conveyance, of which the following is a copy:

“This indenture, made the 27th day of September, A. D. 1884, between Joseph Hocking, party of the first part, and John W. Anderson, the party of the second part, witnesseth that the party of the first part, for the consideration of one dollar-, and other valuable considerations, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, and convey to the party of the second part, and to his heirs and assigns, forever, the right to enter…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Stark v. StarrsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  3. Smith v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Welsh v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Peirsoll v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  3. Peterson v. SucroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  4. Midstate Amusement Corporation v. RiversDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1944
  5. Greenfield v. United States Mortgage Co. of Scotland, Ltd.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1904

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API