Legal Opinion

People v. Watson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 28, 1994No. 1-91-1351PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA

Pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 604(a)(1) (134 Ill. 2d R. 604(a)(1)), the State appeals from an order of the trial court ruling inadmissible scientific evidence offered against defendant, Vernon Watson, who was charged with aggravated criminal sexual assault, armed robbery, and aggravated kidnapping. Prior to trial, defendant filed a motion in limine seeking to exclude the results of a DNA profiling analysis performed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) which indicated that defendant’s DNA matched that of the assailant. The trial court conducted an extensive Frye hearing…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. BaynesIllinois Supreme Court · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. State v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. FreemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API