Legal Opinion
United States v. City of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 22, 2002No. Nos. 01-55182, 01-55453PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, various third parties contend that the district court erred by denying their motions for intervention. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
In the underlying action, the United States alleged that the City of Los Angeles (“the City”), the Board of Police Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles, and the Los Angeles Police Department (“LAPD”) (collectively, the “City defendants”) engaged in a pattern or practice of depriving individuals of constitutional rights through the use of excessive force, false arrests and improper searches and seizures in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Donnelly v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- United States v. Alisal Water Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Wilderness Society v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Perry v. Proposition 8 Official ProponentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Arakaki v. CayetanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. GeithnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.