Legal Opinion
Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n v. Patterson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 9, 1999No. 98-35708PublishedCited by 201 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed September 9, 1999, is amending by adding a new footnote 3 at the end of Part II.B.3, slip op. at 11169, 191 F.3d at 1123, as follows:
3. An adjudication of all of the rights to the use of the surface waters of the Klamath River Basin (“Basin”), within the State of Oregon, is now pending in state court. See United States v. Oregon, 44 F.3d 758 (9th Cir.1994). That is a comprehensive water rights adjudication contemplated by the McCarran Amendment, 43 U.S.C. § 666, and questions of relative amounts and priorities, at least within the State of Oregon, will be decided there.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. DionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State of Montana v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by201 opinions
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Kevin Comer v. Micor, Inc. Kenneth C. Smith Elliot H. Wagner Barbara Arbucci, and Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Doe 1 v. AOL LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Yei Sun v. Advanced China HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.