Legal Opinion
Arakaki v. Cayetano
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 31, 2003No. 02-16269PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Josiah Hoohuli and other native Hawaiians (collectively “Hoohuli”) seek to intervene in a lawsuit challenging the provision of benefits by the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (“OHA”), the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (“DHHL”), and the Hawaiian Homes Commission (“HHC”) to native Hawaiians1 and Hawaiians.2 Hoo-huli, lessees of Hawaiian homestead lands or applicants for such leases, seek intervention on the grounds that they have an interest in continuing to receive benefits as native Hawaiians, and an interest to stop the provision of benefits to Hawaiians by limiting the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rice v. CayetanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Donnelly v. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Sierra Club v. Us Environmental Protection Agency, and City of Phoenix, Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Citizens for Balanced Use v. Montana Wilderness Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Perry v. Proposition 8 Official ProponentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Prete v. BradburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. GeithnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Goldin v. Primavera Familienstiftung, Tag Associates, Ltd. (In Re Granite Partners, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.