Caserta v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant zoning board of appeals of the city of Milford (board)1 appeals from the judg*79ment of the trial court sustaining the plaintiffs appeal from the board’s decision upholding the revocation of the plaintiffs zoning permit. First, the board claims that the trial court improperly considered the plaintiffs intent to reestablish a nonconforming use of the subject property instead of considering the prior owners’ intent. Second, the board claims that if the trial court properly considered the plaintiffs intent to reestablish the nonconforming use, then, in doing so, it improperly assumed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Caserta v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Caserta v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Caserta v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Halloran v. Town of Coventry Zoning Bd., No. Cv 95 58873 S (Jun. 11, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- O'Meara v. Wethersfield Board of Appls., No. Cv 95 0705606 S (Apr. 18, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
- Ozanne v. Darien Zoning Board of Appeals, No. Cv99 0173450 S (Oct. 10, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Perone v. Z. Bd. App., Town, Wallingford, No. Cv 98-0418610 (Sep. 7, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999