Legal Opinion

Caserta v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 14, 1992No. 8665PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

This case is before this court on remand from the Supreme Court. Initially, we concluded that the defendant zoning board of appeals did not have subject matter jurisdiction to hear the plaintiff’s appeal. Caserta v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 23 Conn. App. 232, 580 A.2d 528 (1990). The Supreme Court, after granting the defendant’s petition for certification, reversed our decision and remanded the case for our consideration of the underlying substantive issue. Caserta v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 219 Conn. 352, 593 A.2d 118 (1991). The sole issue to be decided on remand is whether the trial court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Gagnon v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Beit Havurah v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Pascale v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  5. State v. TedescoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Caserta v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Caserta v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Caserta v. Zoning Board of Appeals of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Carr v. Cons. Inland Wtlds. Com., No. Cv 97007340 (Feb. 9, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
  5. Church of the Open Door v. Zoning Bd., Clinton, No. 65386 (Apr. 22, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API