Edmiston v. Kupsenel
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtCarrico, J.
Grey Edmiston, the plaintiff, secured at the hands of a jury a verdict against Samuel Kupsenel, the defendant, in the sum of $28,500.00 for personal injuries received in an automobile accident caused by the negligence of the defendant. . ■. :■
Upon motion of the defendant, the trial court ruled that the jury’s verdict was excessive and put the plaintiff on terms to accept an award of $14,250.00 :'or-face a new trial on the issue of damages. The plaintiff, pursuant to the provisions of Code, § 8-3 50 1 , accepted, under protest, the reduced judgment' for- $14,250.00 and excepted to the action…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smithey v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1961
- Danville Community Hospital, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Simmons v. BoydSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
- Cummings Construction Co. v. School District No. 9Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Modaber v. KelleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
- John Crane, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. DungeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.