Legal Opinion

In Re Judicial Inquiry No. 2005-02

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 25, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

Before us is a petition for review of the order of the panel of judges appointed pursuant to General Statutes § 54-47b (4) to receive applications for investigations into the commission of crimes (panel) denying the request for disclosure filed by the state of Connecticut (state). For the reasons that follow, we grant review, reverse the determination of the panel and remand the matter for further proceedings.

The facts are undisputed. In the fall of 2005, John A. Connelly, state’s attorney for the judicial district of Waterbury, filed with the panel an application for an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  2. Batte-Holmgren v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Peters v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. In Re Allison G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. Fedus v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Judicial Inquiry Number 2005-02Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. In Re Judicial Inquiry No. 2005-02Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API