Legal Opinion
Philip Weinstein v. United States Parole Commission, Harvey Cox, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 11, 1990No. 89-55872PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Philip Weinstein (“Weinstein”) appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his second petition for habeas corpus relief from the Parole Commission’s decision to deny parole. Weinstein contends that the district court erred in finding that he had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. In addition, Weinstein asks us to find as a matter of law that (1) the Parole Commission’s decision to reopen his ease following his successful habeas corpus petition violated 28 C.F.R. § 2.28 because there was no “new information” to consider; and (2) that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Luchai Ruviwat v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the U.S. And Robert Christensen, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Arias, Rene v. The United States Parole Commission Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Lewisburg, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Ayodele Oluwole PopoolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Robert Bialkin v. Benjamin F. BaerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hattie v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Victor Bono v. Michael Benov, Warden, United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Brett C. Kimberlin v. O.I. White and United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Hattie v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Artie Ray Dufur v. John Sullivan, Warden Richard H. Rison, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.