Legal Opinion
Artie Ray Dufur v. John Sullivan, Warden Richard H. Rison, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 30, 1995No. 93-55746Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
46 F.3d 1140
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Artie Ray DUFUR, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
John SULLIVAN, Warden; Richard H. Rison, Warden,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 93-55746.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 25, 1995.*
Decided: Jan. 30, 1995.
Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HALL and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Servando Reyes-Alvarado, United States of America v. Martin Gonzalez-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- James Henry Meador, Jr. v. Joel KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Philip Weinstein v. United States Parole Commission, Harvey Cox, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990