Legal Opinion
Hattie v. Anderson
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 1994No. 1992-2130PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 68 Ohio St.3d 232.] HATTIE, APPELLANT, v. ANDERSON, WARDEN, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Hattie v. Anderson,
1994-Ohio-517.] Criminal procedure—Parole—Parole authority possesses discretion to rescind an unexecuted order for a prisoner to receive parole at a future date without providing a hearing—Habeas corpus unavailable to challenge parole conditions which are restrictive of petitioner's liberty—Declaratory judgment proper remedy to determine constitutionality or constitutional application of parole guidelines. (No.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Guernsey County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Jago v. Van CurenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State ex rel. Horwitz v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Stahl v. ShoemakerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Bell v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Claims · 2009