Legal Opinion
United States v. Ayodele Oluwole Popoola
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 7, 1989No. 88-15311PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant-appellant Ayodele Popoola appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 for bank fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1344, and unauthorized use of an automated teller machine card, 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2).
Review of the district court’s denial of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is de novo. United States v. Birtle, 792 F.2d 846, 847 (9th Cir.1986). We may affirm the district court if Popoola’s allegations, viewed against the record, either fail to state a claim for relief or are “so palpably incredible or patently frivolous as to warrant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marcus T. Baumann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Rodolfo EchegoyenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- United States v. GinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- James Ray Thomas v. R.D. Brewer, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Michael G. Doganiere v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Kurt J. AngeloneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Homer McKinley PeakCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.