Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 16, 1949No. 3823aPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

To the House of Representatives:

The Main question for decision is whether House Bill No. 145 is in conflict with the Constitution of New Hampshire, Part Second, Art. 15 which is as follows: “The presiding officers of both houses of the legislature, shall severally receive out of the state treasury as compensation in full for their services for the term elected the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars, and all other members thereof, seasonably attending and not departing without license, the sum of two hundred dollars exclusive of mileage: provided however, that when a special session shall be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Ferris v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. In Re Advisory Opinion Touching Proposed Legislation to Provide Subsistence & Travel Allowance for Members of the General AssemblySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Overhulse v. ApplingOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State Ex Rel Chapman v. ApplingOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State Ex Rel. Overhulse v. ApplingOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API