Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Overhulse v. Appling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1961Published

1Opinion of the Court

226 Or. 575 (1961)

361 P.2d 86

STATE EX REL OVERHULSE ET AL

v.

APPLING

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued March 14, 1961.

Peremptory writ ordered April 7, 1961.

Roy F. Shields, Portland, and Orval N. Thompson, Albany, argued the cause for plaintiff. With them on the brief was Malcolm F. Marsh, Salem.

Peter S. Herman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for defendant. With him on the brief was Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, Salem.

PEREMPTORY WRIT ORDERED.

O'CONNELL, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding brought to test the constitutionality of senate joint resolution No. 1 of the 51st…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Peay v. NolanTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Pacific Elevator Co. v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. City of Portland v. GoodwinOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Shattuck v. KincaidOregon Supreme Court · 1897

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API