In Re Advisory Opinion Touching Proposed Legislation to Provide Subsistence & Travel Allowance for Members of the General Assembly
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Oil 28 March, 1947, the following Joint Resolution No. 979 was received from the General Assembly of North Carolina:
A JOINT RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN ADVISORY OPINION OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND ASSOCIATE JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA UPON HOUSE BILL NO. 276.
Whereas, House Bill No. 276, providing that each member of the General Assembly shall be entitled to the same subsistence and same allowance for transportation as provided by law for State officials and employees, has been reported favorably by the Committee on Appropriations and is now pending on the Calendar of the House…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Purser v. LedbetterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- In Re SteeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Commercial & Farmers Bank v. WorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Kendall v. . StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Bank v. . WorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ponder v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State Ex Rel Chapman v. ApplingOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949