State Ex Rel. Overhulse v. Appling
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This is a mandamus proceeding brought to test the constitutionality of senate joint resolution No. 1 *579of the 51st legislative assembly which provides that legislators shall be reimbursed for legislative expenses up to specified maximum monthly amounts. The relators are two members of the legislative assembly, Boyd B.. Overhulse, a senator, and Stafford Hansell, a representative. The defendant is Howell Appling, Jr., Secretary of State. Because of the public importance of the question, we took original jurisdiction.
Senate joint resolution No. 1 reads as follows:
“Whereas each member of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Peay v. NolanTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Pacific Elevator Co. v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- City of Portland v. GoodwinOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Shattuck v. KincaidOregon Supreme Court · 1897
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Spearman v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Verry v. TrenbeathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- City of Las Vegas v. AckermanNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Brusco Towboat Co. v. State Ex Rel. State Land BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Johnson v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.