Legal Opinion

Joseph Campbell Preserve Co. v. Holcomb

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1903No. 13,099PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Wyandotte district court; E. L. Fischer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J. :

An offer of employment was made by a letter in the following terms :

“Camden, N. J., April 27, 1899.
“Mr. W. A. Holcomb, care of Gable, Johnson & Jones,. Kansas City, Mo. :
“Dear Sir — We have your letter of the 23d, and we notice that you are like the old chickens in your desire to return to the original hen-roost, to perch upon a comfortable stick, placed there for the convenience of all those old sons who desire to return for the killing of the fatted calf.-
“Seriously speaking, after reading your letter we would say, that it arrived at an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blaine v. Publishers George Knapp & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  2. Butler v. Winona Mill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. Bush v. KollColorado Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Coats v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Dickey v. Coffeyville Vitrified Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Hollingsworth v. ColthurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Campbell v. HartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Fontius Shoe Co. v. LambertonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API