Legal Opinion
Bush v. Koll
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 15, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Richmond, P. J.,
delivered the.opinion of the court.
By the complaint in this case it is alleged that the plaintiff entered into the defendants’ employment for the term of one year, in pursuance of a contract in writing which is in words and figures as follows:—
“ This agreement made in duplicate, this 20th day of August, A. D. 1888, between W. H. Bush, and W. S. Morse, partners under the firm name of ‘Bush & Morse,’ parties of the first part, and John Koll, of Denver, Colo., party of the second part.
“ Witnesseth, that the said parties of the first part have *49this day employed John'Koll as chef…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brown v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Grubb v. RemingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- Daveny v. ShattuckNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1880
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hardison v. A. H. Belo Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Fontius Shoe Co. v. LambertonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Joseph Campbell Preserve Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- McCartney v. BadovinacSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Butsch v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1917