Fontius Shoe Co. v. Lamberton
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Allen
This is an action to recover a bonus under a contract of employment. There was a judgment for plaintiff. Defendant has sued out this writ, and the cause is before us upon an application for a supersedeas.
The defendant below is a corporation engaged in the business of selling shoes at retail. Plaintiff was a clerk in the employ of defendant. His compensation was fixed by a written contract. The complaint is predicated upon an oral contract, but the findings and judgment of the trial court were based upon the written contract. Plaintiff sues for a bonus alleged to be due him under his contract,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Joseph Campbell Preserve Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Bush v. KollColorado Court of Appeals · 1892
3Cited by11 opinions
- Montgomery Ward Co., Inc. v. GuignetIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Spooner v. Reserve Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Barnes v. Van Schaack MortgageColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Lampley v. Celebrity Homes, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1979
- Dove v. Rose Acre Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.