Legal Opinion

Hollingsworth v. Colthurst

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 3, 1908No. 15,606PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error from Cowley district court; CARROLL L. Swarts, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The plaintiff sued for stipulated damages claimed to have been suffered on account of the defendant’s refusal to carry out a contract for the purchase and sale of real estate. The transaction involved an exchange of land, and the contract contained the following provision: “It is further agreed and understood by the parties to this contract that each party shall furnish an abstract showing satisfactory title to the above-named properties.”

The petition did not allege that the plaintiff furnished an abstract showing satisfactory title to his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Church v. ShanklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Liberman v. BeckwithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  3. Averett v. LipscombeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
  4. Joseph Campbell Preserve Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Stotts v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Read v. LoftusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. United States Trust Co. v. Incorporated Town of Guthrie CenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Pulsifer v. WalkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  5. Louisville Trust Co. v. Bayer Steam Soot Blower Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API