Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Board of Lucas County Commissioners

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1992No. 92-489PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

For a writ of mandamus to issue, CFT must show that it is entitled to respondents’ performance of a clear legal duty and that it has no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State, ex rel. Matheis, v. Russo (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 204, 553 N.E.2d 653.

CFT argues that R.C. 305.31 establishes a duty to hold a referendum on Resolution No. 91-1728 at the next primary or general election. Respondents reply that Resolution No. 91-1728 was adopted as an R.C. 5739.026(A)(3) emergency measure and argue that R.C. 5739.026(A)(5)2 either prohibits or *751does not authorize referenda on such measures.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State ex rel. Board of Education v. Butler County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State ex rel. O.M. Scott & Sons Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Matheis v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. North Main Street Coalition v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State ex rel. Rogers v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API