Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1994No. 93-2552PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reason stated in the court’s opinion, i.e., declaratory judgment provides an adequate remedy to appellant and its availability was thus an appropriate basis to deny the writ. State ex rel. Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 749, 752, 591 N.E.2d 691, 693; State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovern (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 129, 11 OBR 426, 464 N.E.2d 525, paragraph two of the syllabus; R.C. 2731.05.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State ex rel. Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Board of Lucas County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Earl v. ShaferOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Konoff v. ShaferOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Yonkings v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Yonkings v. WilkinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Konoff v. ShaferOhio Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API