Legal Opinion

Electrical Products Corp. v. Ziegler Drug Stores, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, C. J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal. On April 29,1929, plaintiff, Electrical Products Corporation of Oregon, entered into a contract with Ziegler Drug Stores, Inc., a corporation, to install and lease to said Ziegler Drug Stores certain advertising signs known as “Claude Neon Sign” and to maintain and service said signs.

The facts are stated substantially as follows: The Ziegler Drug Stores operated 15 stores in the city of Portland, and this contract applied to these various stores. The contract contained a provision to the effect that, if there should be a default on the part of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winters v. GrimesOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Electrical Products Corp. v. Ziegler Drug Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Keene v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. La Grande v. Portland Public MarketOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Hubbard v. Olsen-Roe Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frank Settelmeyer & Sons, Inc. v. Smith & Harmer, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ter Har v. BackusOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Columbia Auto Works, Inc. v. YatesOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Durkheimer Investment Co. v. ZellOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State Unemployment Compensation Commission v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API