Legal Opinion

Durkheimer Investment Co. v. Zell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1939PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The plaintiff and appellant, Durkheimer Investment Company, an Oregon corporation, on November 22, 1938, filed its third amended complaint against the defendants and respondents, Harry A. Zell, Julius S. Zell and Zell Brothers & Co., in which complaint six causes of action are alleged. Thereafter the court granted the motion of the individual defendants to strike from that pleading the first, second, third and fourth alleged causes of action, “for the reason that each of said causes of action” was a literal repetition “of the same cause of action alleged in plaintiff’s second amended…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winters v. GrimesOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Abrahamson v. Northwestern Pulp & Paper Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Freeman v. AmbroseWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Whitehead v. StringerWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Electrical Products Corp. v. Ziegler Drug Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Moore v. West Lawn Memorial Park, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Lulay v. EarleOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hopfer v. StaudtOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Ter Har v. BackusOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State Unemployment Compensation Commission v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API