Legal Opinion

Columbia Auto Works, Inc. v. Yates

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1945PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

One of the two major questions presented by this appeal is whether the order of the district court denying defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment and decree of foreclosure is an appealable order.

The solution of this question lies in determining whether this case comes within either of two purported exceptions to the general rule that an order refusing to vacate an appealable order, judgment or decree is not an appealable order.

One of those exceptions which defendant invokes is that where the original judgment order or decree is void an appeal will lie from an order refusing to vacate it.

The…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. O'Hara v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Macartney v. ShipherdOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Sturgis v. SturgisOregon Supreme Court · 1908

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Waybrant v. BernsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Dean v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Price v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1977
  4. Salitan v. DashneyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State Unemployment Compensation Commission v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API