Legal Opinion

Keene v. Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1904PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From Marion: George H. Burnett, Judge. Action by R. G. Keene against Z. T. Smith, in which ' the Secretary of State was served with notice of garnishment as to Smith’s wages due from the State of Oregon. From an order dismissing the garnishment, this appeal is taken.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton

The plaintiff, having recovered a judgment in the justice’s court against the defendant Z. T. Smith, procured an execution to be issued upon it, by virtue of which a notice of garnishment was served upon the Secretary of State, with a view of attaching any sum that might be found due Smith from the State, he being an employé thereof. The secretary moved for a discharge of the garnishment, upon the ground that he is not^amendable thereto, which motion having been allowed, the plaintiff appealed to the circuit court,and,the judgmentof the justice’s court havingbeen affirmed, plaintiff now…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Salem Mills Co. v. LordOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Whale v. GatchOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Case v. NoyesOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Smith v. ConradOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Burns v. PayneOregon Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Tomasek v. Oregon State Highway CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Caldwell Backing & T. Co. v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Electrical Products Corp. v. Ziegler Drug Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Graf v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API