Legal Opinion

State Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Bates

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1961PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This case is here for the second time.

The first appeal was taken by the plaintiff from a judgment for the defendant entered pursuant to the allowance of a motion by defendant for a directed verdict. This court reversed, and, as provided in the mandate, remanded the cause to the court below “with directions to take further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Court herein * * Unemployment Comp. Com. v. Bates, 217 Or 121, 341 P2d 119.

After receipt of the mandate by the circuit, court, the plaintiff moved for judgment in its favor based on the mandate. The court allowed the motion,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Macartney v. ShipherdOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Lang v. Camden Iron WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Adams v. MacKenzieOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Colgan v. Farmers' & Mechanics' BankOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Columbia Auto Works, Inc. v. YatesOregon Supreme Court · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Beglau v. AlbertusOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Waybrant v. BernsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Martin Engineering Co., Inc. v. OptonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Ter Har v. BackusOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Clubb v. HansonOregon Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API