Legal Opinion
State v. Harrigan
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided January 6, 1982PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LONGOBARDI, Judge.
This is the Court’s decision on Defendant’s Rule 35(a) motion challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support two of his three robbery convictions.
Marvin P. Harrigan was convicted of robbing three individuals on the evening of December 23, 1977. For purposes of this motion, the facts related herein pertain to the testimony of the events during the robbery.
Bruce DeMayo, his seven year old sister, his father, George DeMayo, and his grandmother, Nora Windon, had just gotten into Mr. DeMayo’s car behind the Classic Touch when the Defendant Harrigan ran up to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
- People v. JuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
- Schaffer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Paris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Harrigan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- State v. BridgersSuperior Court of Delaware · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.