Paris v. United States

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Both appellants were convicted of armed robbery, 1 assault with intent to commit robbery while armed, 2 and assault with intent to kill while armed; 3 appellant Driver was also convicted of carrying a pistol without a license. 4 On appeal they present three arguments for reversal. First, they maintain that the evidence was insufficient to sustain their convictions of armed robbery and assault with intent to commit robbery while armed because there was no direct evidence that either of them was armed during the commission of the robbery. Second, appellants contend that…