State v. Bridgers
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILVERMAN, J.
Defendants robbed a bank, taking money from several bank employees and threatening several customers at gunpoint. At trial, the court told the jury to consider, among other things, whether Defendants robbed the customers from whom nothing was taken. The jury convicted on all counts. Now, Defendants ask the court to reconsider whether, as a matter of law, threatening a bystander while robbing someone else also makes the bystander a robbery victim. In other words, can it be said that a person who was not the subject of a theft was, nonetheless, robbed?
I
At this point, there…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. MiraultSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Commonwealth v. GillardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- State v. CarlosNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Harrigan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ramsey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Chrichlow v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Desmond v. Hall-LongDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Desmond v. PierceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.