Legal Opinion

State v. Bridgers

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 19, 2007No. ID 0611011332/0611011352 and 0611011396PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SILVERMAN, J.

Defendants robbed a bank, taking money from several bank employees and threatening several customers at gunpoint. At trial, the court told the jury to consider, among other things, whether Defendants robbed the customers from whom nothing was taken. The jury convicted on all counts. Now, Defendants ask the court to reconsider whether, as a matter of law, threatening a bystander while robbing someone else also makes the bystander a robbery victim. In other words, can it be said that a person who was not the subject of a theft was, nonetheless, robbed?

I

At this point, there…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MiraultSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. GillardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. State v. CarlosNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  4. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  5. Harrigan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  2. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  3. Chrichlow v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  4. Desmond v. Hall-LongDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
  5. Desmond v. PierceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API