Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 2001No. 97-CF-812PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALLAGHER, Senior Judge:

On January 9, 1997, after a jury trial, appellant Curtis A. Smith was convicted of armed robbery in violation of D.C.Code §§ 22-2901 and -3202 (1996). Smith raises three issues on appeal. First, he argues that the trial judge erroneously denied his motion to suppress the identifications of two eyewitnesses. Second, he asserts that the trial judge improperly permitted the government to introduce evidence of his pre-trial flight. Finally, he posits that the government failed to present evidence sufficient to establish that he was armed and, therefore, that the trial…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. Larry Allen MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. People v. JollyMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Comford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Hartridge v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Graham v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API