Holland v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Southerland, C. J.:
Defendant was convicted in the Municipal Court of the City of Wilmington for selling beer without a license. On appeal to the Superior Court the case was heard de novo by a judge without a jury. She was again convicted, and again appeals.
The only question of consequence presented by this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence that the bottle purchased contained beer. The facts are these:
At about two-thirty o’clock in the morning of October 17, 1953, Odel Mitchell went to defendant’s home in the City of Wilmington. According to his testimony he asked the defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hawkins v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- Patrick v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- State v. BiterSuperior Court of Delaware · 1955
- Parson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
- State v. PritchettSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.