Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 6, 1990No. 1 CA-CR 88-927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Judge.

May the state secure prostitution convictions and avoid the burden of proving obscenity against women who, in the setting of a sex show theatre, perform sexual acts upon each other for the gratification of customers who pay to watch? That is the central question of this case. Defendant claims on appeal that, because the acts were in the nature of theatrical performance, the state was obliged to prove obscenity to establish that they lacked protection of the First Amendment. The state responds that, whatever their expressive content, these were acts of prostitution as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. SteigerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State of Arizona v. GreenArizona Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. Wooten v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. State v. FreitagCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. State v. OanesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API