Legal Opinion

State v. Freitag

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 2, 2006No. 1 CA-CR 04-0770PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SNOW, Judge.

¶ 1 Christopher Freitag appeals his conviction in Phoenix Municipal Court for soliciting an act of prostitution. He presents two issues on appeal: 1) whether the City of Phoenix prostitution ordinance violates his constitutional rights in light of Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508 (2003), and 2) whether the appellate filing fees imposed by the Phoenix Municipal Court violate the rights of the accused guaranteed by the Arizona Constitution. We hold that the City’s prostitution ordinance is constitutional but the City’s collection of a fee from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Standhardt v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. State of Arizona v. GreenArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  5. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Patrick EdouardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. State v. RussoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. Amended December 3, 2014 State of Iowa v. Patrick EdouardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  5. State of Iowa v. Patrick EdouardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API