Legal Opinion
Madden v. Cowen & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 7, 2009No. 07-15900PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Judges Hug, Noonan, and Ikuta vote to deny Cowen’s petition for rehearing. Judge Ikuta votes to deny Cowen’s petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Hug and Noonan so recommend. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 35. Cowen’s petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are therefore denied.
The opinion filed February 11, 2009, appearing at 556 F.3d 786, is hereby withdrawn. A superseding opinion will be filed simultaneously with this order.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. DabitSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Romano v. KazacosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Proctor v. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement FundSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Northstar Financial Advisors Inc. v. Schwab InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. TroiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.