Legal Opinion
Anderson v. METALCLAD INSULATION CORP.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 1999No. A082253PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEIN, J.
Warren L. Anderson, Jr., appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Metalclad Insulation Corporation (Metalclad) after the court granted Metalclad’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that Anderson’s complaint seeking recovery for asbestos-related injury was filed after the limitations period specified in Code of Civil Procedure section 340.2.
Anderson contends that the court erred in shifting the burden to Anderson to submit evidence that he was not disabled, because the evidence Metalclad submitted was insufficient to support the inference that Anderson was disabled,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Brantley v. PisaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Magnolia Square Homeowners Ass'n v. Safeco InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Pichon v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Bacon v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Stewart v. Preston Pipeline Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Consumer Cause, Inc. v. SmilecareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Erikson v. NunninkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Karlsson v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Optional Capital, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss, Hauer & Feld LLP, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.