Legal Opinion
United States v. Davio
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 30, 1955No. Civ. A. 10707PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN, District Judge.
The United States of America filed this action for damages against defendants under the Act of March 8, 1946, c. 80, § 1, 60 Stat. 37, 41 U.S.C.A. § 51, commonly known as The Anti-Kickback Act. 1
The undisputed facts disclose that during the years 1944-45, one August Bruñe was supervisor of the reproduction department of the Fisher Body Division of the General Motors Corporation employed in Michigan. During that time, Fisher Body was the major subcontractor under North American Aviation, Inc. of Kansas, a prime contractor with a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee contract with the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Continental Management, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Acme Process Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- United States v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. General Dynamics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Acme Process Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.