Legal Opinion
In re Castle Braid Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 25, 1906PublishedCited by 22 opinions
In Bankrutcy. Review of holding of referee that under the proofs of claims submitted herein, and the peculiar facts appearing therefrom and the objections thereto, both duly verified, the burden of proceeding with evidence in support of the claims is on the claimants, and consequently that the trustee, objecting, need not produce any evidence in support of the allegations of the objections filed.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
In due form the proof of claim of Meyer W. Schloss and Joseph W. Schloss, jointly, alleges:
“That the Castle Braid Company, the corporation against which a petition for adjudication of bankruptcy has been filed, was, at and before the filing of said petition, and still is, justly and truly indebted to said deponent and Joseph W. Schloss, jointly, in the sum of sixty-six thousand fire hundred and sixty-two and 47/100 ($68,502.47) dollars and interest. That the consideration of said debt is as follows: That said corporation agreed with deponent and said Joseph W. Schloss, by…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Sage v. . CulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Whitney v. DresserSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- San Antonio Hardware Co. v. SangerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Mannington v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1910
- In Re O'BrienUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- In Re BrittUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1996
- In re Tichenor-Grand Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1913
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.