Medtronic, Inc. v. American Optical Corporation
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
LARSON, District Judge.
The defendant’s motion to transfer this action is the second chapter in what promises to be a multi-volumed history of a controversy surrounding the validity of two patents in the cardiac pacemaker field. A summary of the facts of this dispute is not necessary in view of the publication of the introductory chapter, Medtronic, Inc. v. American Optical Corp., 327 F.Supp. 1327 (D.Minn.1971); however, a survey of the procedural history is in order.
Plaintiff is a Minnesota corporation whose principal place of business is also in Minnesota. Defendant is a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Codex Corporation and Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Milgo Electronic Corporation and International Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- James Q. Horne, Jr. v. Adolph Coors Company R. S. Woods, Inc. And Kingston Wine and Liquor Shop, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Nelson v. Master Lease Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Amazon. Com v. Cendant Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2005
- American Optical Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.