Legal Opinion
Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided January 30, 1974No. C.D. 4499PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FoRd, Judge:
The cases listed in schedule “A,” annexed hereto and made a part hereof, cover offgrade filaments. The merit of the issue was decided favorably for the plaintiff in the case of Wedemann & *15Godknecht, Inc., a/c Burlington Industries, Inc., et al. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 475, C.D. 3199, 275 F. Supp. 1017 (1967). In addition, tlie court ordered further testimony to be adduced relating to the question of the authority to file a protest.
After a further hearing, the court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss on the ground that Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc. did not act as agent of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Top Form Brassiere Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Du Pouey v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Holt v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. Consolidated Computer Services International, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1974
- United States v. Wedemlann & Godknecht, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975