Pasco Terminals, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
MALETZ, Judge:
Defendant has moved pursuant to rule 4.7(b)(1) and (2) to dismiss the present action for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that plaintiff is neither an importer, consignee or authorized agent within the meaning of section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1514), 1 and hence lacked standing to file the protests herein and, upon their denial, to invoke the jurisdiction of this court under 28 U.S.C. § 1582, as amended. 2
The action to which this motion is addressed involves the validity of the assess ment of dumping duties on four entries of crude sulphur in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stahmann v. VidalSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Top Form Brassiere Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
3Cited by6 opinions
- PQ Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Orbisphere Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- SCM Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- Pasco Terminals, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Mohawk Recreation Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.