State v. Turner
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for carrying a concealed weapon, namely, a ninja sword. ORS 166.240. The issue on appeal is whether the officer stopped defendant without reasonable suspicion to believe that defendant was carrying a concealed weapon. We review the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress for errors of law, State v. Woodall, 181 Or App 213, 217, 45 P3d 484 (2002), and conclude that, having seen a sufficient portion of the ninja sword to identify it as a sword, the officer did not reasonably suspect that it was “concealed” within the meaning of ORS 166.240. His stop of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. RuffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.