Levald, Inc. v. City of Palm Desert
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We are called upon to consider, yet again, a takings challenge to mobile home rent control laws.
I
Levald, Inc. owns a mobile home park in the city of Palm Desert, California. Residents of the park own their mobile homes but rent pads from Levald. Levald provides private streets and common areas, along with other lesser amenities. The vast majority of mobile homes are never moved once they are placed in the park.
The park is subject to California’s Mobile-home Residency Law, California Civil Code § 798 et seq. (“the residency law”). The impetus for the residency law…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by217 opinions
- Nano Maldonado v. Tony Harris, in His Capacity as Acting Director of the California Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Courtney Bird v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Kuhnle Brothers, Inc. v. County of GeaugaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4219, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5827 the San Remo Hotel Thomas Field Robert Field T & R Investment Corp. v. City and County of San Francisco, a Municipal Corporation Department of City Planning Board of Permit Appeals San Francisco Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.