Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Greenwich Motors Corporation
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 11, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
A. receiver of The Greenwich Motors Corporation was appointed December 1st, 1930. There came into his possession two automobiles, a Chrysler sedan and a Chrysler coupé, title to, or an interest in, both of which is claimed by the Connecticut Credit Corporation as the result of certain so-called financing operations between it and the Motors Corporation. The facts affecting the title to the two automobiles are not the same, and present two distinct questions of law upon this appeal.
1. On October 17th, 1930, The Greenwich Motors Corporation executed a conditional sales contract of the Chrysler…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re Wilcox & Howe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- New Haven Wire Co. CasesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
- Harris v. CoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Adler v. Ammerman Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Spencer v. BroughtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Isp. Com LLC. v. TheisingIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- State Savings Bank v. Universal Credit Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Colonial Finance Co., Inc. v. DebenignoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Premium Commercial Corporation v. KasprzyckiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Pietrantonio v. ScaloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935