Colonial Finance Co., Inc. v. Debenigno
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover the possession of an automobile delivered to the Bethel Motor Sales, Inc., on February 7, 1938, under an agreement of trust in accordance with § 767d of the 1937 Supplement to the General Statutes, the “Uniform Trusts Receipts Act.” The plaintiff, engaged in financing automobile sales, occupies the position of an “entruster” under the act and claims the right to repossess the car in order to effectuate its security. The Bethel Motors occupied the position of “trustee” under the act. By its terms, where a trustee has liberty of sale and sells to a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- New Haven Wire Co. CasesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
- Spooner v. CummingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Lewis v. McCabeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- Columbus Buggy Co. v. TurleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
- Pratt v. BurhansMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stemmons, Inc. v. Universal CIT Credit CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Associates Discount Corp. v. Rattan Chevrolet, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1969
- Premium Commercial Corporation v. KasprzyckiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Budget Plan, Inc. v. SavoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.