Legal Opinion
Isp. Com LLC. v. Theising
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 2004No. 29S02-0308-CV-366PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER FROM THE INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS, NO. 29A02-0207-CV-0610.
BOEHM, Justice.
The plaintiff is David J. Theising, as the receiver of IQuest Internet, Inc. The defendants responded to his complaint with a motion to compel arbitration of the dispute. The motion was based on an arbitration clause in an agreement entered into between the defendants and IQuest before IQuest was in receivership. The trial court refused to compel arbitration and the Court of Appeals affirmed that order on interlocutory appeal. We hold that the arbitration clause is enforceable against the receiver…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Hays and Company, as Trustee for Monge Oil Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Safety National Casualty Co. v. Cinergy Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Wattenbarger v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Vernon Jones, Jr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Keybank National Ass'n v. ShipleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Fine v. Sovereign BankDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.