Legal Opinion
Adler v. Ammerman Furniture Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 8, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
We correct the finding in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of the motion to correct. We strike out paragraphs 10, 12, 18, 19 and 20 of the finding as allegations of legal claims and not findings of fact, and add paragraph 6 of the draft-finding. These additions to and subtractions from the finding are included in the statement of the case as made above.
The defendant’s title to this truck depends upon whether the New Haven Bank had a right to sell to it the truck, and that depends upon whether Exhibit A is a chattel mortgage or a conditional contract of sale. “A chattel mortgage is a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Wilcox & Howe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. Puritan Laundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Williams v. ChadwickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- Petello v. Teutonia Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Romeo v. MartucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bickart v. SanditzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Armstrong v. Greenwich Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Cappelletti v. TierneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Terzano v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- In re Lathrop Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.