Legal Opinion

United States v. Carfang

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided December 6, 1984No. ACM 24486PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

Pursuant to his pleas the appellant was convicted of multiple drug abuse allegations involving marijuana and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). A pretrial agreement limited the approved sentence to a dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for five years, total forfeitures, payment of a $2,500.00 fine to the United States, and reduction to airman basic. Appellate defense counsel argue that the military judge erred by admitting evidence which contained uncharged misconduct and which served no evidentiary purpose since the case was a guilty plea. They also…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. StokesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. KeithU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. SwaggerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. DawdyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. CiullaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  2. United States v. HawksU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  3. United States v. PowellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994
  4. United States v. McDavidU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. MurphyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API